Crime Time WILLIAM 2019 02 27.180000 - Sách nói Miễn phí

Crime Time: Dierebeskermingswet

Goeie naand! Trevor Nasser se Vyfster se vir jou dat dit so net na 18:00 moet wees en dat dit weer tyd is vir Crime Time waar ek jou `n blik op die misdaadwereld gee.  Ek is William Munnik. Ek hoop jy het `n misdaadvrye week gehad. Die week was weer geken deur plaasaanvalle en moorde en verkragtings en huisbrake en diefstalle ens. Onluste het ook sporadies sy kop uitgesteek. Dit het alles net deel geraak van alledaagse lewe in Suid- Afrika.  Ons is ook al moeg vir ESKOM grappies en die korrupsie in die Parlement. Dis snaaks hoe ons volkie is. Ons is nie meer geskok om te hoor van die korrupsie op top vlak en hoe ons eens mooie land verkrag word deur `n paar individue vir geld nie. Nee ons maak maar grappies daaroor.Niks skok ons meer nie. Korrupsie deur Parlementslede is nie meer nuus nie. Ek dink ons sal geskok wees as daar `n Parlementslid gevind word wie regtig sy werk doen en sy kant bring. Dit sal  voorblad nuus wees in die koerant. Dink maar aan die opskrif: “ Parlementslid van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regering doen `n earlike dag se werk.” Ons as volk sal geskok wees en sal `n kommissie van ondersoek miljoene rande spandeer om uit te vind hoe dit gebeur het. Ek dink dist yd vir `n musiekbreek voordat iets gese word wat kon gebly het. Ek speel vir jou vir Luis Fonsi en Demi Lovato se Echame La Culpa en Demi Lee Moore se Sproetjies en Enigma se Return to Innocence.

Dit was Luis Fonsi en Demi Lovato se Echame La Culpa en Demi Lee Moore se Sproetjies en Enigma se Return to Innocence en ek is William Munnik met Crime Time waar ek jou `n blik op die misdaadwereld gee. Vanaand gaan ek met jou praat oor `n saak wat my naby aan die hart le en dit is die Dierebeskermingswet. Ons diere het ook beskerming nodig en hartseer genoeg het hulle beskerming van ons mense nodig. Ons wie veronderstel is om na hulle om te sien. Daar is werklik wrede mense daar buite en dan is hulle veral wreed teenoor diere. Die wet is in Engels geskryf so ek gaan gedeeltes daaruit aanhaal in Engels.

Die wet staan bekend as die Dierebeskermingswet wet 71 van 1962

Doelstelling:

Die wet is geskryf om al die wette aangaande diere, Hetsy mak of wild, te konsolideer onder een wet.

Definisies:

Dier:

Enige dier beteken enige dier of hy nou mak of wild is wat in aanhouding deur `n persoon aangehou word.

Misdade

2. (I) Any person who-

a cruelly overloads, overdrives, overrides, eats, beats, goads, ill-treats, neglects, infuriates, terrifies, tortures or maims any animal; or

(b) confines, chains, tethers or secures any animal unnecessarily or under such conditions or in such a manner or position as to cause that animal unnecessary suffering or in any place which affords inadequate space, ventilation, light, protection or shelter from heat, cold or weather; or

(c) unnecessarily starves or under-feeds or denies water or food to any animal; or

(d) lays or exposes any poison or any poisoned fluid or edible matter or infectious agents except for the destruction of vermin or marauding domestic animals or without taking reasonable precautions to prevent injury or disease being caused to animals; or

(e) being the owner of any animal, deliberately or negligently keeps such animal in a dirty or parasitic condition or allows it to become infested with external parasites or fails to render or procure veterinary or other medical treatment or attention which he is able to render or procure for any such animal in need of such treatment or attention, whether through disease, injury, delivery of young or any other cause, or fails to destroy or cause to be destroyed any such animal which is so seriously injured or diseased or in such a physical condition that to prolong its life would be cruel and would cause such animal unnecessary suffering; or

(f) uses on or attaches to any animal any equipment, appliance or vehicle which causes or will -cause injury to such animal or which is loaded, used or attached in such a manner as will cause such animal to be injured or to become diseased or to suffer unnecessarily; or

(g) save for the purpose of training hounds maintained by a duly established and registered vermin club in the destruction of vermin, liberates any animal in such manner or place as to expose it to immediate attack or danger of attack by other animals or by wild animals, or baits or provokes any animal or incites any animal to attack another animal; or

(h) liberates any bird in such manner as to expose it to immediate attack or danger of attack by animals, wild animals or wild birds; or

(i) drives or uses any animal which is so diseased or so injured or in such a physical condition that it is unfit to be driven or to do any work; or –

(j) lays any trap or other device for the purpose of capturing or destroying any animal, wild animal or wild bird the destruction of which is not proved to be necessary for the protection of property or for the prevention of the spread of disease; or

(k) having laid any such trap or other device fails either himself or through some competent person to inspect and clear such trap or device at least once each day; or

(/) except under the authority of a permit issued by the magistrate of the district concerned, sells any trap or other device intended for the capture of any animal, including any wild animal (not being a rodent) or wild bird, to any person who is not a bonafide farmer; or

(m) conveys or carries any animal-

(i) under such conditions or in such a manner or position as to cause that animal unnecessary suffering; or

(ii) in conditions affording inadequate shelter, light or ventilation or in which such animal is excessively exposed to heat, cold, weather, sun, rain or dust; or

(iii) without making adequate provision for food, water and rest for such animal; or (n) without reasonable cause administers to any animal any poisonous or injurious drug or substance; or

(o) keeps, uses or manages or assists or acts in the management of any premises or place used for the purpose or partly for the purpose of fighting of any animal or receives any consideration for the admission of any person to any such premises or place; or

{p) being the owner of any animal, deliberately or without reasonable cause or excuse, abandons it, whether permanently or not, in circumstances likely to cause that animal unnecessary suffering; or

(q) causes, procures or assists in the commission or omission of any of the aforesaid acts or, being the owner of any animal, permits the commission or omission of any such act; or

(r) by wantonly or unreasonably or negligently doing or omitting to do any act or causing or procuring the commission or omission of any act, causes any unnecessary suffering to any animal, shall, subject to the provisions of this Act and any other law, be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding two hundred rand or in default of payment to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months or to such imprisonment without the option of a fine, or, where any such act or omission is of a wilful and an aggravated nature, to a whipping not exceeding six strokes or to both such a fine and such a whipping or to both such imprisonment without the option of a fine and such a whipping. (2) For the purposes of sub-section (1) the owner of any animal shall be deemed to have permitted or procured the commission or omission of any act in relation to that animal if by the exercise of reasonable care and supervision in respect of that animal he could have prevented the commission or omission of such act.

Dis weer tyd vir `n musiekbreek en ek speel vir jou vir Depeche Mode met Walking in my shoes en Dewald Wasserfall met Eendag as ons groot is en Twent One Pilots met Heathen.

Dit was Depeche Mode met Walking in my shoes en Dewald Wasserfall met Eendag as ons groot is en Twent One Pilots met Heathens en ek is William Munnik met Crime Time waar ek jou `n blik op die misdaadwereld gee. Voor die breek het ek gepraat oor die Dierebeskermingswet wet 71 van 1962 en wat alles gesien word as misdade aangaande hierdie wet. Nou gaan ek kyk na die hof se bevoegdhede en magte.

3. (1) Whenever a person is convicted of an offence in terms of this Act in respect of any animal, the court convicting him may in addition to any punishment imposed upon him in respect of that offence-

( a) order such animal to be destroyed if in the opinion of the court it would be cruel to keep such animal alive;

(b) order that the person convicted be deprived of the ownership of such animal;

(c) declare the person convicted to be unfit to own or be in charge of any animal, or of any animal of a specified kind, for a specified period;

(d) make any order with regard to such animal as it deems fit to give effect to any order or declaration made under any of the preceding paragraphs .

(2) Any person who is found in possession or in charge of any animal in contravention of a declaration made in terms of paragraph (c) of sub-section (1), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties prescribed in sub-section {1) of section two.

4. (1) Whenever any person is convicted by a magistrate's Power of court court of an offence under this Act and it is proved that such to award damages. person has by the commission of that offence caused loss to any other person or that any other person has as the result of such offence incurred expense in providing necessary veterinary attention or treatment, food or accommodation for any animal in respect of which the offence was committed or in caring for such animal pending the making of an order by the court for the disposal thereof, the court may, on application by such other person or by the person conducting the prosecution acting on the instructions of such other person, summarily enquire into and determine the amount of the loss so caused or expense so incurred and give judgment against the person convicted and in favour of such other person for the amount so determined, but not exceeding an amount of four hundred rand. (2) Any such judgment shall have effect as if it had been given in a civil action duly instituted before such court. (3) The provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply in respect of- (a) any costs incurred in connection with the custody of an animal seized in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1955 (Act No. 56 of 1955), for the purposes of a prosecution in terms of this Act; and (b) any costs incurred in connection with the destruction of an animal in terms of an order under paragraph (a) of sub-section (1) of section three and the removal and burial or destruction of the carcass.

Wanneer mag `n Polisiebeampte `n dier van kant maak.

(1) Whenever a police officer is of the opinion that any animal is so diseased or severely injured or in such a physical condition that it ought to be destroyed, he shall, if the owner be any animal. absent or refuses to consent to the destruction of the animal, at once summon a veterinarian or, if there is no veterinarian within a reasonable distance, two adult persons whom he considers to be reliable and of sound judgment, and if such veterinarian or adult persons after having duly examined such an animal certify that the animal is so diseased or so severely injured or in such physical condition that it would be cruel to keep it alive, such police officer may without the consent of the owner destroy the animal or cause it to be destroyed with such instruments or appliances and with such precautions and in such manner as to inflict as little suffering as practicable.

(2) Any police officer who destroys any animal or causes it to be destroyed in the absence of the owner shall, if such owner's name and address are known, advise him of the destruction, and where the destruction of any animal takes place on any public place or road shall, subject to the provisions of the Animal Diseases and Parasites Act, 1956 (Act No. 13 of 1956), remove the carcass or cause it to be removed therefrom.

(3) A veterinarian may in respect of any animal exercise the powers conferred by sub-section (1) upon a police officer without summoning another veterinarian, police officer or any other person, and in respect of such exercise of those powers the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply. (4) Any expenses which may be reasonably incurred by any police officer or veterinarian in carrying out the provisions of this section may be recovered from the owner of the animal in question as a civil debt. (5) It shall be a defence to an action brought against any person arising out of the destruction of an animal by him or with his authority, to prove that such animal was so severely injured or so diseased or in such a physical condition that it would have been cruel to have kept it alive, and that to summon a police officer or follow the procedure prescribed in this section would have occasioned unreasonable delay and unnecessary suffering to such animal.

Vandag sal `n Polisiebeampte nie so iets doen nie, want interne opdragte se dat hy dit nie mag doen nie en `n veearts moet kontak om die dier van kant te maak. As die dier egter `n gevaar inhou vir ander mense kan die polisiebeampte die dier van kant maak, maar dan gaan hy hom beroep op die regverdigingsgronde van Noodweer.

Dis weer tyd vir musiek en ek speel vir jou vir Tiesto se Adagio for strings

Dit was Tiesto se Adagio for strings en ek is William Munnik met Crime Time waar ek jou `n blik op die misdaadwereld gee.  Ek kyk vanaand na die Dierebeskermingswet en wat al die misdade is en wat die magte van die hof en polisie is en ons sien dat hulle ernstig is met hierdie wet om diere van ons mense te beskerm. Mense is wreed teenoor mekaar en nog wreder teenoor diere. Dit is hartseer, want ek glo dat as jy nie vir `n dier kan life wees en met respek kan behandel nie, hoe gaan  jy dit teenoor `n dier doen. Ons moet ons diere liefhe, want hulle is soos onskuldige kinders. Kyk maar hoe mishandel mense hulle honde en katte en ons kinders sien dit en dink dat dit reg is en doen dit weer wanneer hulle groot is. So gaan die siklus net aan totdat dit gestop word of totdat daar nie meer diere oor is nie.

Op daardie noot het dit tyd geraak om te groet en ek speel vir jou vir Eddy Grant met Do you feel my love.